Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB v. Davila et al
as 1:2023cv00059
Plaintiff:
Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB as Trustee of WV 2017-1 Grantor Trust, and Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB
Defendant:
Miguel Angel Davila and Maria Concepcion Davila
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-1657
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-3451
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Miguel Davila v. County of Lackawanna, et al
as 14-2992
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIGUEL A. DAVILA
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF LACKAWANNA, CORRECTIONAL CARE INC and LACKAWANNA COUNTY PRISON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-1930
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Davila v. County of Lackawanna et al
as 3:2013cv00574
Plaintiff:
Miguel A Davila
Defendant:
County of Lackawanna and Correctional Care, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gomez Davila v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2012cv01885
Plaintiff:
Jose Miguel Gomez Davila
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Evanston Insurance Company v. Chacon-Lopez et al
as 3:2011cv01701
Plaintiff:
Evanston Insurance Company
Defendant:
Nilda Chacon-Lopez, Quality Health Services of Puerto Rico, Hospital San Cristobal, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv01092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CitiMortgage, Inc. v. Saez-Davila et al
as 3:2011cv01186
Plaintiff:
CitiMortgage, Inc.
Defendant:
David Miguel Saez-Davila, Melissa Alvarado-Morales and Conjugal Partnership Saez-Alvarado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
