Cases 21 - 30 of 79
G et al v. CARROLL
as 4:2018cv00100
Plaintiff:
H G , M G , C P and others
Defendant:
MIKE CARROLL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv24047
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0754 Discrimination
Irons v. Carroll et al
as 2:2017cv00561
Plaintiff:
Daneal Jusman Irons
Defendant:
Mike Carroll, Donald Sawyer, Rebecca Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAVENDER v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES et al
as 4:2017cv00430
Plaintiff:
DARYL L LAVENDER
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES, MIKE CARROLL, KAREN C PARKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOWRY v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 3:2017cv00654
Petitioner:
SHAWN LOWRY
Respondent:
MIKE CARROLL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
William Overcash, et al v. Mark Shelnutt, et al
as 17-13721
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM TODD OVERCASH, an individual
Interested Party - Appellant:
HENRY GEORGE FERRO
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK D. SHELNUTT, an individual, MARK D. SHELNUTT, P.A., LORI A. FOULTZ, an individual and others
:
SERVICE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00717
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abaunza v. Geo Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv00194
Plaintiff:
Alvaro Abaunza
Defendant:
Geo Group, Inc., Correct Care Recovery Solutions, George Zoley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barber v. Carrol et al
as 2:2017cv00174
Plaintiff:
Charles Junior Barber
Defendant:
Mike Carrol, Shan Jumper, Marta Prado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Craig Gilbert v. State of Florida, et al
as 17-10493
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CRAIG IVAN GILBERT
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF FLORIDA, RICK SCOTT, DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Mike Carroll and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
