Cases 1 - 10 of 79
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01582
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00392
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Wright v. Bymes et al
as 1:2023cv01148
Plaintiff:
Howard Bruce Wright, Jr.
Defendant:
Dan Bymes and Mike Carroll
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Deborah Cooney v. Molly Dwyer, et al
as 23-15236
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEBORAH COONEY
Defendant / Appellee:
MOLLY C. DWYER, Clerk of Court, United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Individually and in Her Official Capacity, SUSAN Y. SOONG, Clerk of Court, Office of the Clerk, United States District Court, Individually and in Her Official Capacity, LYNMOORE AT LAWNWOOD ASSISTED LIVING AND MEMORY CARE and others
Juan Vega v. Secretary, Department of Child, et al
as 20-10451
Petitioner / Appellant:
JUAN FRANCISCO VEGA
Respondent / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA, Pamela Jo Bondi, in her official capacity and SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, Mike Carroll, in his capacity
COOPER v. CARROLL
as 1:2019cv00218
Defendant:
MIKE CARROLL
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY L COOPER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deborah Cooney v. City of San Diego, et al
as 19-16180
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF WHITE SULPHUR SPRINGS, CHRISTOPHER JACOBS, AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF STATE TROOPERS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEBORAH COONEY
Daniel v. Carroll (DeSoto County)
as 2:2019cv00332
Respondent:
Mike Carroll
Petitioner:
Phillip A. Daniel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bryant v. Carroll (Orange County)
as 2:2019cv00262
Respondent:
Mike Carroll
Petitioner:
Erik Bryant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rosato v. Sawyer et al
as 2:2019cv00107
Defendant:
Donald Sawyer, Mike Carroll, Genna Brisson and others
Plaintiff:
Dominic Anthony Rosato
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
