Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Christian Dior Couture SA v. Lin
as 26-1029
Defendant:
XIAOLIU WANG, XIAOLE LIN, XINGYUN HU and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN DIOR COUTURE SA, ABC and LOUIS VUITTON MALLETIER
Christian Dior Couture SA v. Lin
as 26-976
Defendant:
XIAOLIU WANG, XINGYUN HU, DEF and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN DIOR COUTURE SA, LOUIS VUITTON MALLETIER and ABC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv02679
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
LI v. JADDOU et al
as 2:2024cv04749
Plaintiff:
SHUI MING LI
Defendant:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, KATHLEEN BAUSMAN, UR M. JADDOU and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto
as 1:2024cv04935
Defendant:
UNYS, Guangzhoushiyifeimengfushishangxing d/b/a TheOneQueen, AINK and others
Plaintiff:
Roadget Business Pte. Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03561
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
SUPER 8 WORLDWIDE, INC. et al v. NORTHLAND HOTEL, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv03163
Plaintiff:
SUPER 8 WORLDWIDE, INC. and WYNDHAM HOTELS & RESORTS, INC.
Defendant:
NORTHLAND HOTEL, INC., JUI J. LIN and MING LI LIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Chanel, Inc. v. Lin et al
as 1:2023cv02004
Plaintiff:
Chanel, Inc.
Defendant:
Xiaole Lin, Shun Miao Ding, Guo L Huang and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01718
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
