Cases 1 - 10 of 37
MONTOOTH v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00333
Plaintiff:
MIRANDA MONTOOTH
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01624
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Miranda et al v. KZRV, LP
as 3:2023cv00706
Plaintiff:
Kristina Miranda and Raul Miranda
Defendant:
KZRV, LP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Miller et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 1:2023cv00163
Plaintiff:
Lavon Miller and Miranda Miller
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Not Classified By Court:
Kevin Fitzharris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
PETRO v. MYERS et al
as 2:2023cv00132
Plaintiff:
KEVIN R. PETRO
Defendant:
MATTHEW MYERS, JOHN MARTOCCIA, TYLER STILLABLOWER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BUCKLEY v. CENTURION HEALTH et al
as 2:2023cv00108
Plaintiff:
PATRICK WAYNE BUCKLEY
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH, PABLO PEREZ, DUSHAN ZATECKY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EDMONDSON et al v. GERMAN AMERICAN BANK
as 1:2022cv01745
Plaintiff:
MIRANDA P. EDMONDSON and JOSHUA A. EDMONDSON
Defendant:
GERMAN AMERICAN BANK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
RIFE v. BRIDGESTONE RETAIL OPERATIONS, LLC
as 1:2022cv01751
Plaintiff:
MIRANDA RIFE and MARANDA RIFE
Defendant:
BRIDGESTONE RETAIL OPERATIONS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
BESECKER v. LOOP et al
as 4:2022cv00084
Plaintiff:
COURTNEY BESECKER
Defendant:
FRANK LOOP, BRANDON REARDON, COLTON MCPHEETERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vandoren v CitiMortgage, Inc
as 1:2022cv00003
Plaintiff:
Miranda Vandoren
Defendant:
Citimortgage, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
