Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Michael Rushing v. Yazoo County, et al
as 20-60462
Defendant / Appellee:
VAN R. FOSTER, In Official Capacity and Individually, WILLIE WRIGHT, In Official Capacity and Individually, DAVID BERRY, III, In Official Capacity and Individually and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL T. RUSHING
Rushing v. Yazoo County et al
as 3:2018cv00764
Defendant:
Alva P. Taylor, Jayne H. Dew, The Board of Supervisors of Yazoo County, MS and others
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Rushing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Allan Query, et al v. Maxim Integrated Products, Inc, et al
as 10-17756
:
In re: MAXIM INTEGRATED PRODUCTS, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ALLAN QUERY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, THE DEKALB COUNTY PENSION PLAN, MISSISSIPPI PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM and others
Objector - Appellant:
NATIONAL AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER INDUSTRY PENSION FUND
Defendant:
MAXIM INTEGRATED PRODUCTS, INC., CARL W. JASPER, JOHN F. GIFFORD and others
Mississippi Public Employees', et al v. Semtech Corp., et al
as 10-56341
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MIDDLESEX COUNTY RETIREMENT SYSTEM, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS GROUP, LAWRENCE CHAYT, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellant:
SEMTECH CORP., MOHAN R. MAHESWARAN, DAVID G. FRANZ, Jr. and others
Mississippi Public Employers v. Boston Scientific Corporation, et al
as 10-1663
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JACK YOPP, ROBERT L. GARBER, BETTY C. MEYER and others
Defendant - Appellee:
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION, JAMES R. TOBIN, PAUL A. LAVIOLETTE and others
Movant:
POLICE AND FIRE RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF THE CITY OF DETROIT and BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION, Institutional Investor Group
Middlesex County Retirement, et al v. Semtech Corp., et al
as 10-80115
Plaintiff - Respondent:
MIDDLESEX COUNTY RETIREMENT SYSTEM, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS GROUP, LAWRENCE CHAYT, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
SEMTECH CORP., JOHN D. POE, JASON L. CARLSON and others
IN RE: Satyam Computer Services, Ltd., Securities Litigation
as 1:2009md02027
In Re:
IN RE: Satyam Computer Services, Ltd., Securities Litigation
Lead Plaintiff:
The Global Institutional Investor, Sampension KP Livsforsikring A/S, SKAGEN AS and others
Plaintiff:
Aberdeen Claims Administration, Inc., Trustee for Aberdeen Claims Trust and Aberdeen Claims Trust II
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Wayne Lau, Aekta Ben Patel, Hossein Momenzadeh and others
Petitioner:
Priyanka Arora, Integre Advisors, Labourers' Pension Fund of Central and Eastern Canada and others
Defendant:
Maytas Infra Limited, Maytas Properties, Byrraju Teja Raju and others
Consolidated Defendant:
B. Rama Raju, B. Ramalinga Raju, Satyam Computer Services Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
In Re: Boston Scientific Corp., et al
as 09-8014
Plaintiff:
CITY OF PONTIAC, City of Pontiac Policemen's and Firemen's Retirement System, ROBERT L. GARBER, Individually, and on Behalf of all Others Similarly Situated, JACK YOPP, Individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Plaintiff - Respondent:
MISSISSIPPI PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM
Defendant - Petitioner:
LAWRENCE C. BEST, BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION, FREDERICUS A. COLEN and others
:
, and
Lawrence Chayt et al v. Semtech Corp. et al
as 2:2007cv07939
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Chayt, Lawrence Chayt, Lawrence Chayt and others
Defendant:
Semtech Corp., John D Poe, Jason L Carlson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Middlesex County Retirement System et al v. Semtech Corp. et al
as 2:2007cv07114
Plaintiff:
Middlesex County Retirement System, Middlesex County Retirement System, Middlesex County Retirement System and others
Defendant:
Semtech Corp., John D Poe, Jason L Carlson and others
Movant:
Mississippi Public Employees' Retirement System
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
