Cases 1 - 10 of 549
TEAGUE v. MITCHELL et al
as 3:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
THOMAS T. TEAGUE, SR.
Defendant:
DANNY MITCHELL, DIANE PHEIFFER, I. RANDOLPH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REAMER v. MITCHELL
as 1:2024cv00559
Plaintiff:
ADAM REAMER
Defendant:
BRADEN MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SCHWOEPPE v. MITCHEL
as 3:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
JOHN SCHWOEPPE, JR.
Defendant:
DAN MITCHEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MITCHELL v. WARDEN
as 2:2024cv00035
Petitioner:
LAKESHA MITCHELL
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McGee et al v. Schindler et al
as 2:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Tawana Ann McGee and Timothy D'Angelo Mickell
Defendant:
Stephen Schindler, Benjamin Lopez and Mitchell Tipton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McGruder v. Camery et al
as 1:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Makiyah McGruder
Defendant:
Jason Camery, Treon, McMullen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HUGHES v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2023cv00228
Plaintiff:
DEANDRE HUGHES
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, ROBERT E. CARTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HUGHES et al v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2023cv00223
Plaintiff:
DEANDRE HUGHES
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, CHARLENE BURKETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
S.S. v. MILES
as 1:2023cv02218
Plaintiff:
S.S.
Defendant:
MITCHELL R. MILES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
ARCHER v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2023cv00221
Plaintiff:
RONNIE ARCHER
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ATTORNEY GENERAL (THEODORE ROKITA), COMMISSIONER (CHRISTINA REAGLE) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
