Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Harihar v. Smith et al
as 1:2023cv10628
Plaintiff:
Pro Se Party Mohan A. Harihar
Defendant:
Hon. Kevin T Smith, Maeve Moran and John Dupuis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Harihar v. Burroughs et al
as 1:2023cv10521
Plaintiff:
Pro Se Party Mohan A. Harihar
Defendant:
Allison Dale Burroughs, Robert M. Farrell, Karen Folan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Harihar v. Jeanne D' Arc Credit Union et al
as 1:2022cv11648
Plaintiff:
Pro Se Party Mohan A. Harihar
Defendant:
Jeanne D' Arc Credit Union and Sandra Boulay
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Saini v. Singh
as 1:2021cv11044
Defendant:
Parmjit Singh
Plaintiff:
Mohan S. Saini
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harihar v. Jeanne D'Arc Credit Union et al
as 1:2020cv12293
Defendant:
Esq, Sandra Boulay and Jeanne D'Arc Credit Union
Plaintiff:
Pro Se Party Mohan A. Harihar and Mohan A. Harihar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Prashad et al
as 4:2019cv40114
Defendant:
Savton, LLC, Mohan Prashad, Lanaton, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Carbonite, Inc. v. Mohan
as 1:2018cv12331
Defendant:
Deepak Mohan
Plaintiff:
Carbonite, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Harihar v. Howard et al
as 1:2018cv11134
Plaintiff:
Mohan A. Harihar
Defendant:
Jeffrey R. Howard, Juan R. Toruella, William J. Kayatta and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Harihar v. United States of America
as 1:2017cv11109
Plaintiff:
Mohan A. Harihar
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Batavitchene v. COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS et al
as 1:2017cv10597
Plaintiff:
Audrone Batavitchene
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS , Argie Shapiro , Norfolk County District Attorney Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
