Cases 1 - 10 of 24
SINGHA v. CITIZENS BANK et al
as 2:2023cv01101
Plaintiff:
EBENEZER MOHAN SINGHA
Defendant:
CITIZENS BANK, MS. GRACE LORAS, MR. YUAN CARTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Civil Rights: Other
Mendy et al v. Boxrec et al
as 1:2022cv00535
Plaintiff:
Edward Bissau Mendy, Brendon Denes, Ivana Habazin and others
Defendant:
Boxrec, John Sheppard, Samson Lu and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Chakrabarti et al v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 2:2021cv01316
Plaintiff:
Atreyi Chakrabarti, Mohan ABBURU, Majid ABDUL and others
Defendant:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and Ur Jaddou
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
WHITFIELD v. STAMPS.COM INC. et al
as 2:2021cv04094
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Defendant:
STAMPS.COM INC., KEN MCBRIDE, MOHAN P ANANDA and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
MOHAMMED v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2020cv04700
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JOHN DOE(S) 1 through 10, Officer JAMES CRUSEMIRE and others
Plaintiff:
MOHAMMED MOHAMMED and MOHAMMED MOHANNED
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00548
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
SPEARMAN v. SOTELLO et al
as 2:2018cv02595
Plaintiff:
MELVIN SPEARMAN
Defendant:
ANGELIQUE SOTELLO, ALONZO DAWSON, MELANIE BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ridge v. Giglio et al
as 3:2017cv00250
Plaintiff:
Luther T. Ridge, Jr.
Defendant:
Michael A. Giglio, Larry R. Snyder, Jorge E. Alvarez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Ratanchandani
as 3:2016cv00851
Plaintiff:
Dominic Miller
Defendant:
Mohan T Ratanchandani
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gray v. Ratanchandani
as 3:2016cv00701
Plaintiff:
Zaire Gray
Defendant:
Mohan T Ratanchandani
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
