Cases 1 - 10 of 1,034
Flickinger v. Castillo et al
as 5:2024cv02915
Plaintiff:
Jason Archie Flickinger
Defendant:
Jaqueline Reyes Castillo, Robert Crisp, Pedro Quintero and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Molina Rojas, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3010
Petitioner:
MAYRA MOLINA ROJAS and LESLIE PAHUAMBA MOLINA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Molina-Salvador v. Garland
as 24-2904
Petitioner:
LUIS ALBERTO MOLINA-SALVADOR
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cheng v. United States of America
as 24-1131
Plaintiff:
SHENG-WEN CHENG, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, C.O. ANDRE HICKSON, Warden JEAN RENE and others
Molina-Herrera v. Garland
as 24-1043
Petitioner:
MIRNA ELIZABETH MOLINA-HERRERA and BRIAN ALEXANDER CRUZ-MOLINA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Molina-Cardoza, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2514
Petitioner:
SANDRA MOLINA-CARDOZA and MATEO GARCIA-MOLINA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Greg Hale, et al v. ARcare, Inc
as 24-1726
Plaintiff:
Greg Hale, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Melissa Johnson, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Alicia Gilmore, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated and others
Defendant:
ARcare, Inc, originally named as ARcare
US v. Luis Barrera
as 24-6308
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
LUIS CENOBIO BARRERA, a/k/a Daniel Munguia Casanova, a/k/a Felipe Molina Garcia
Molina-Escobar, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1919
Petitioner:
ROGER ADOLFO MOLINA-ESCOBAR, ELISA MORALES-ALVARADO, EMELY MICHELLE MOLINA-MORALES and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Molina De Acevedo, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1848
Petitioner:
KARLA MELISSA MOLINA DE ACEVEDO, MAILYN ALONDRA ACEVEDO-MOLINA and ADONYS GILBERTO ACEVED-QUINTANILLA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
