Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Mahmoud v. Dzurenda et al
as 2:2026cv01886
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Abdalla Mahmoud
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, Brian Williams, Julie Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rocco v. Royal et al
as 3:2026cv00194
Plaintiff:
Raphael Rocco
Defendant:
Terry Royal, Haymen, Rigney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mahmoud v. Dikin et al
as 2:2026cv00794
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Abdalla Mahmoud
Defendant:
Dikin, Nowell, Bob Fulker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Riley et al.
as 1:2026cv00516
Plaintiff:
Marcuiece Johnson
Defendant:
Melissa Riley, Shyla Mollet and Scott Moran
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Riley et al
as 4:2025cv01239
Plaintiff:
Marcuiece Johnson
Defendant:
Melissa Riley, Shyla Mollet and Scott Moran
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mahmoud v. Royal et al
as 3:2025cv00674
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Abdalla Mahmoud
Defendant:
Terry Royal, David Drummond, Malinger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mahmoud v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2025cv00486
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Abdalla Mahmoud
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, Jeremy Bean, Brian Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mahmoud v. Royal et al
as 3:2025cv00145
Defendant:
Terry Royal, David Drummond, Hernandez and others
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Abdalla Mahmoud
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mollet et al v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas LLC et al
as 3:2024cv02781
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Mollet and Matthew Mollet
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Texas LLC, Walmart Inc, Walmart Super Center #2649 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Graham v. Dreesen, et al.
as 24-6542
Plaintiff:
SANKONA GRAHAM
Defendant:
CURTIS RIGNEY, MOLLET, JULIE WILLIAMS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
