Cases 1 - 10 of 33
WALLACE v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
SHAWN WALLACE
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, HARRY, L. HARRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Steven Woodson, Jr. v. Jodi Sheesley, et al
as 23-2942
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVEN W. WOODSON, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
JODI SHEESLEY, BRIAN SIMONS, ANGEL GRESSEL and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01026
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Glavin Ivy v. John Wetzel, et al
as 23-1589
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GLAVIN IVY
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN WETZAL, LAUREN BLAKE, J. WINTERS and others
CAESAR v. KEMP et al
as 1:2023cv00042
Plaintiff:
LAMONT CAESAR
Defendant:
SARGEANT KEMP, SUPERINTENDANT OBERLANDER, DEP SUPERINTENDENT MONGELLUZZO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Rochester et al v. Irwin et al
as 1:2022cv02001
Plaintiff:
Faheem Rochester and Carlos Serbia
Defendant:
Randy Irwin, E. Mongelluzzo, J. Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heyward v. Oberlander et al
as 4:2022cv01454
Plaintiff:
Joseph Heyward
Defendant:
Derek Oberlander, Rene Adams-Kinezel, Ernest Mongelluzzo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
CEASAR v. VARNER et al
as 1:2021cv00323
Plaintiff:
DIMITRIC CEASAR
Defendant:
D. VARNER, KERRI MOORE, T. BIEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
EASLEY v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2021cv00251
Plaintiff:
WARREN EASLEY
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, OBERLANDER, SARATELLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
SIDES v. FISCUS HEARING EXAMINER et al
as 1:2021cv00249
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY SIDES
Defendant:
FISCUS HEARING EXAMINER, OBERLANDER, R. ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
