Cases 1 - 10 of 94
Hines v. Cooley Dismukes et al
as 5:2026ct03053
Plaintiff:
Corey Tashombae Hines
Defendant:
Leslie Cooley Dismukes, Peter R. Buchholtz, Larry Dail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brisbon v. Priest et al
as 5:2026ct03011
Plaintiff:
Omeako L. Brisbon
Defendant:
Pazavar Priest, Captain Nicholson, Jamese Vigus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRISBON v. PRIEST et al
as 1:2025cv01077
Plaintiff:
OMEAKO L. BRISBON
Defendant:
PAZARAR PRIEST, NICHOLSON, CAPTAIN JAMIESE VIGUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Al-Hanif El v. Sculley et al
as 5:2025cv00180
Plaintiff:
Adisah Lacy Al-Hanif El
Defendant:
FNU Sculley, FNU Quinn, Ronnie Huneycutt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. Jardon et al
as 1:2025cv00274
Plaintiff:
Kee'Andus Barnes
Defendant:
Teresa Jardon, FNU Fry, T. Cannon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Corso v. Ishee et al
as 5:2025ct03090
Plaintiff:
Leland Thomas Corso, Jr.
Defendant:
Todd Ishee, Monica Bond, Donnie R. Raynor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James McNeill v. Bryon Harris
as 25-6294
Plaintiff:
JAMES C. MCNEILL
Defendant:
BRYON T. HARRIS, MONICA BOND, JOHNNY HAWKINS and others
Ellis v. Bond et al
as 5:2025ct03065
Plaintiff:
Samuel Ellis
Defendant:
Monica Bond, David Williams, Mark Fleming and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. Jardon et al
as 1:2025cv00086
Plaintiff:
Kee'Andus Barnes
Defendant:
Teresa Jardon, FNU Fry, T. Cannon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cureton v. Ishee et al
as 5:2025ct03058
Plaintiff:
Keith Cureton, Jr.
Defendant:
Todd E. Ishee, John R. Gray, Mark Fleming and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
