Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Cardwell v. Thornell et al
as 4:2023cv00356
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Cardwell
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell, Christopher Josefowicz, Mario DeFranco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demetrius T. Freeman v. J. Zilliox et al
as 5:2022cv00097
Plaintiff:
Demetrius T. Freeman
Defendant:
Correctional Officer J. Zilliox, Lieutenant A. Garibay, Correctional Officer Christmas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Monk #068675 v. Saidahmad et al
as 2:2020cv02464
Defendant:
Unknown Saidahmad and Unknown Kruszyna
Plaintiff:
Timothy C Monk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Monk #068675 v. Rode et al
as 2:2020cv01661
Defendant:
B Larson, Unknown Juarez, Jeffrey Rode and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Charles Monk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coretta Simo Love Monk v. Alex Villanueva
as 2:2020cv02631
Defendant:
Sheriff Alex Villanueva, Captain Laura E Lecrivain, Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department and others
Plaintiff:
Ms. Coretta Simo Love Monk and Coretta Simo Love Monk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Deegan v. State of California et al
as 2:2019cv02310
Defendant:
Gavilanes, Richardson, Mortell and others
Plaintiff:
Sidney Ross Deegan, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) West v. High Desert State Prison
as 2:2019cv01640
Plaintiff:
Michael West
Defendant:
High Desert State Prison, CDCR, Spears and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Cesar Pulido v. Walter Monk, et al
as 18-35429
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CESAR CARDENAS PULIDO
Defendant - Appellee:
WALTER MONK, an individual and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
John Bettys v. Kevin Quigley, et al
as 18-35285
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN E BETTYS
Defendant:
KEVIN QUIGLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
HOLLI CORYELL, ELENA LOPEZ, JUSTIN GRIMM and others
Melinda Valenzuela v. Bryon Monts, et al
as 17-17534
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MELINDA GABRIELLA VALENZUELA
Defendant - Appellee:
BRYON MONTS, RONALDO CHAVEZ, TIMOTHY CHARLES MONK and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
