Cases filed in Oklahoma
Joe Hand Promotions Inc v. Happy Monk LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00063
Defendant: Chaoran Tang, Happy Monk LLC doing business as Happy Monk Club and Scott Tang
Plaintiff: Joe Hand Promotions Inc
Kupzyk v. Boley et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2020cv00498
Defendant: John Monk, Matt Boley, Benji Fuentes and others
Plaintiff: Matthew Richard Kupzyk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00092
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00053
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Woodson v. McCollum et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2017cv00094
Plaintiff: Marcus D Woodson
Defendant: Tracy McCollum , Bruce Bornhiem , Joe Allbaugh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Cantu Services Inc v. Monk et al
as 5:2014cv00860
Plaintiff: Cantu Services Inc
Defendant: Kevin Monk , Renee Ellender Roberie , Joseph Burton and others
Intervenor: Blackstone Consulting Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Essex Insurance Company v. Bayless et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2012cv00226
Plaintiff: Essex Insurance Company
Defendant: Tina Bayless, All Star Tavern, LLC, James Monk and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance
Knox v. Aldridge et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2010cv00044
Plaintiff: Antone L. Knox
Defendant: Debra Aldridge, Amy Thomas, Brian Holden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knox v. Sockey et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2009cv00274
Plaintiff: Antone L. Knox
Defendant: W.A. Sockey, Amanda Workman, Vickie Harless and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?