Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00617
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Massie et al v. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention et al
as 1:2022cv00031
Plaintiff:
Honorable Thomas Massie, Honorable Rand Paul, Honorable Andy Biggs and others
Defendant:
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Rochelle P. Walensky and Sherri A. Berger
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Mooney v. Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00066
Defendant:
Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc., AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 1, AT&T Services, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Marchelle Mooney
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362 ERISA
Roberts v. Commonwealth of Kentucky et al
as 4:2018cv00096
Plaintiff:
Carol Roberts
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Kentucky, Matt Bevin, Tom Summers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00225
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mooney v. Cigna Group Insurance
as 3:2017cv00313
Plaintiff:
Michael Mooney
Defendant:
Cigna Group Insurance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00375
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hudson v. Mooney
as 3:2013cv00371
Plaintiff:
Sara A. Hudson
Defendant:
Kevin Mooney and Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gilmore v. USP McCreary et al
as 6:2013cv00025
Plaintiff:
Errick Gilmore
Defendant:
USP McCreary, J.C. Holland, Maruka and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
