Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03250
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Gonzalez v. Callison
as 6:2026cv04050
Plaintiff:
Oscar Mora Gonzalez
Defendant:
Michael C Callison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
MORA v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
as 2:2026cv12006
Plaintiff:
FRANKLYN MORA
Defendant:
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
MORA v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
as 2:2026cv12008
Plaintiff:
ROBERTO MORA
Defendant:
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Gomez-Perez et al v. Lugo-Gonzalez et al
as 3:2026cv01592
Plaintiff:
Yajaira Del Carmen Gomez-Perez, A.R.G., M.R.G. and others
Defendant:
Dr. Oscar Lugo-Gonzalez, Jane Doe spouse of Dr. Oscar Lugo-Gonzalez, Conjugal Partnership Lugo-Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03178
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jesus Mora Garcia v. Todd Blanche
as 26-2858
Petitioner:
JESUS ALBERTO MORA GARCIA
Respondent:
TODD W. BLANCHE, Attorney General of the United States
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02867
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00988
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
