Cases 41 - 50 of 783
Spears v. Morris et al
as 6:2023cv00220
Plaintiff:
Greg Spears
Defendant:
Chris Morris, John Perteet and Jaydon Pingleton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States v. Morris
as 23-3148
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
SHAWN KYLE MORRIS
US Bank National Association v. Morris et al
as 5:2022cv00208
Plaintiff:
US Bank National Association doing business as US Bank Equipment Finance
Defendant:
Kevin Morris and OneDoc Managed Print Services LLC doing business as OneDoc Managed Print Services doing business as OneDoc MPS Leasing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Morris v. Payne
as 5:2023cv03133
Petitioner:
Christopher P. Morris
Respondent:
Kevin Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
American General Life Insurance Company v. Bradford et al
as 4:2023cv00207
Defendant:
Linda M Bradford, Linda M Patterson, Estate of Morris Lee Bradford, Jr, The and others
Counter Defendant:
American General Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
United States v. Morris
as 23-3108
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DANIELLE MORRIS
Johnson v. Reynolds, et al
as 23-1161
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
TERESA REYNOLDS, NATALIYA NICKELS, POWELL and others
Pittman v. Smith et al
as 1:2023cv01156
Plaintiff:
Emanuel Pittman
Defendant:
Smith and Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peshlakai v. Foreman et al
as 1:2023cv00521
Petitioner:
Rumaldo Peshlakai
Respondent:
Mark Foreman and Denis Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
United States v. Morris
as 23-7042
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
BRADLEY WAYNE MORRIS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
