Cases 31 - 40 of 153
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
STONE et al v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2021cv00752
Defendant:
ASHLEY MOODY, DAN CALDWELL, CHRIS BRUYN and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SARHAN and BARBARA STONE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
LEWIS et al v. PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION
as 1:2015cv01328
Plaintiff:
ROGER JOSEPH WILLIS, ELY CHEN, GEORGE J. BARR and others
Defendant:
ESTATE OF NICHOLAS L. AMABILE, ESTATE OF DANIEL H. COURTNEY, ESTATE OF LAWRENCE D. OLBRIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03578
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
MORRIS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2020cv02635
Defendant:
JOHNSN & JOHNSON CONSUMER, PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
FREDDIE MORRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MORRIS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2020cv02636
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
SHIRLEY MORRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GUTIERREZ v. MORRIS et al
as 1:2020cv01827
Plaintiff:
NORA GUTIERREZ
Defendant:
DAVID MORRIS, AMANDA BERARD and CELIA MORRIS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
ALEXANDER v. CARVAJAL et al
as 1:2020cv01897
Plaintiff:
MORRIS ALEXANDER
Defendant:
MICHAEL CARVAJAL, UNITED STATES FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, JESSE BELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHIEN v. MORRIS et al
as 1:2019cv03101
Defendant:
MARA L RANSOM, DENIS BRAND MORRIS and MARA L. RANSOM
Plaintiff:
ANDREW CHIEN
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
MORRIS v. BARR
as 1:2020cv00814
Petitioner:
MIGUEL JUNIOR MORRIS
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
