Cases 1 - 10 of 50
BABER et al v. DUNLAP
as 1:2018cv00465
Plaintiff:
TERRY HAMM-MORRIS, BRUCE POLIQUIN, MARY HARTT and others
Intervenor Defendant:
JARED GOLDEN, KAYLEE MICHAUD, TIFFANY BOND and others
Defendant:
MATTHEW DUNLAP and PAUL LEPAGE
Amicus Curiae:
CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORRILL v. SKOLFIELD et al
as 1:2018cv00213
Plaintiff:
DANIEL MORRILL
Defendant:
HEATHER SKOLFIELD, PINE TREE LEGAL ASSISTANCE INC, JANET MILLS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORRILL v. SKOLFIELD et al
as 1:2018cv00169
Plaintiff:
DANIEL MORRILL
Defendant:
HEATHER SKOLFIELD, PINE TREE LEGAL ASSISTANCE INC, JANET MILLS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORRIS v. FISH SHACK LLC
as 2:2017cv00448
Plaintiff:
RYISHISA D MORRIS
Defendant:
FISH SHACK LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
JOHNSON et al v. CITY OF BIDDEFORD et al
as 2:2017cv00264
Plaintiff:
SUSAN JOHNSON and DERRICK THOMPSON
Defendant:
CITY OF BIDDEFORD, BIDDEFORD POLICE DEPARTMENT, MAINE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALBERT v. MURTIFF et al
as 1:2014cv00440
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J ALBERT, SR
Defendant:
BENJAMIN J MURTIFF, CITY OF AUGUSTA, VINCENTE MORRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORRIS et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 2:2014cv00273
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA MORRIS and RON BAILYN
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, ETHICON INC and ETHICON LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WIDI v. MCNEIL et al
as 2:2012cv00188
Plaintiff:
DAVID J WIDI, JR
Defendant:
PAUL MCNEIL, STEPHEN E HICKEY, JR, CHRISTOPHER J DURKIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LIEBERMAN v. MACMASTER et al
as 1:2012cv00095
Plaintiff:
JOHN D LIEBERMAN
Defendant:
BRIAN MACMASTER and JOHN MORRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
FREEMAN et al v. MORRIS
as 1:2011cv00452
Plaintiff:
JAMES FREEMAN , DIANE MESSER and OCCUPY AUGUSTA
Defendant:
JOHN E MORRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
