Cases 41 - 50 of 974
Johnson v. Director
as 6:2023cv00240
Petitioner:
Morris Landon Johnson, II
Respondent:
TDCJ-CID Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hadel v. Morris et al
as 3:2023cv00115
Plaintiff:
Thomas Hadel
Defendant:
Olivia Morris and David Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Morris v. Jakes
as 3:2023cv00751
Plaintiff:
Gregory Morris
Defendant:
FNU Jakes and TD Jakes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doe v. City View Independent School District et al
as 7:2023cv00032
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 1 7:23-cv-32-O
Defendant:
City View Independent School District, Anthony Ray Bushong, Daryl Frazier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Fendley v. PNC Bank National Association
as 4:2023cv01144
Plaintiff:
Edgar Morris Fendley
Defendant:
PNC Bank National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
Barnes, II v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC et al
as 4:2023cv01077
Plaintiff:
Festus Delton Barnes, II
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES TEXAS, LLC and LAJEANNA MORRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Fields v. Martin et al
as 4:2023cv01133
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Fields
Defendant:
Amy Martin, Neil Davis, III, Chanice Newton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson II v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2023cv00284
Petitioner:
Morris Landon Johnson II
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Johnson II v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2023cv00283
Petitioner:
Morris Landon Johnson II
Respondent:
TDCJ-CID Director and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stross v. Morris Glass Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00263
Plaintiff:
Alexander Stross
Defendant:
Morris Glass Company, Inc., Kerry Morris and Julie Morris
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
