Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Black et al v. Philips North America LLC et al
as 1:2024cv11152
Plaintiff:
Daniel Black, Sally Gadd, Barry Godofsky and others
Defendant:
Philips North America LLC, Philips Holding USA, Inc. and Philips RS North America LLC,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Bowdre v. Moses et al
as 1:2023cv12640
Plaintiff:
Faye Bowdre
Defendant:
Kimberly Moses, Frank Phillips, Department of Children and Family and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Herren v. City of Fall River et al
as 1:2023cv12048
Plaintiff:
Michael Herren
Defendant:
City of Fall River, Edmond Desmarais, individually and in his capacity as a police officer, Moses Pereira, individually and in his capacity as a police officer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Thomas v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2023cv11981
Plaintiff:
Moses Thomas
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv12236
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv11920
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv11820
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carresi v. City of Newton
as 1:2020cv11538
Plaintiff:
Brian Malo, James White, Stephen Hodgdon and others
Defendant:
City of Newton
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Koppel v. Moses
as 1:2020cv11479
Plaintiff:
James Koppel
Defendant:
William Moses
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Early v. Town of Webster et al
as 4:2019cv40134
Defendant:
Officer Suss, Officer Trainor, Town of Webster and others
Plaintiff:
Moses Early
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
