Cases 1 - 10 of 67
George v. cawston et al
as 2:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Andrea D George
Defendant:
rodney cawston, jack ferguson, andrew joseph, jr and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 1302 Indian Civil Rights
George v. The Colville Confederated Tribes et al
as 2:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Andrea D George
Defendant:
rodney cawston, jack ferguson, Richard Moses and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 1302 Indian Civil Rights
Saeedy et al v. Microsoft Corporation
as 2:2024cv00219
Plaintiff:
Noah Saeedy, Vishal Shah, Tina Wilkinson and others
Defendant:
Microsoft Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Amazon.com Inc. et al v. Nyutu et al
as 2:2023cv01681
Plaintiff:
Amazon.com, Inc., Amazon.com Services LLC, Quincy Bioscience, LLC and others
Defendant:
Nelson Kamwaro Nyutu, A2X LLC, A2X Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Cuevas v. Carpenter
as 2:2023cv00265
Petitioner:
Moses Joseph Cuevas
Respondent:
Eric Carpenter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cuevas v. Psoinos et al
as 2:2023cv00243
Plaintiff:
Moses Cuevas
Defendant:
Daniel Psoinos, Eric Carpenter, Amdar Momeni and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. King County et al
as 2:2023cv01034
Plaintiff:
Ray Clarence Rogers
Defendant:
King County, Department of Adult and Juvenile Detention, Allen Nance and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Eslick v. State of Washington et al
as 2:2021cv00282
Plaintiff:
Patrick Eslick and Patrick Lee Eslick
Defendant:
State of Washington, Jason P Aebischer, Grant County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Moses v. Saul
as 1:2020cv03185
Plaintiff:
Austin L Moses
Defendant:
Andrew M Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Johnson v. Tacoma Police et al
as 3:2020cv05548
Defendant:
Tacoma Housing Development, Brame, Tacoma Police and others
Plaintiff:
Brenda M Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
