Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Culpepper v. Watts Regulator Co. et al
as 7:2020cv00128
Defendant:
Watts Regulator Co. a/k/a, d/b/a, Mueller Steam Specialty Co., Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Watts Regulator Co. a/k/a d/b/a Mueller Steam Specialty Co.
Plaintiff:
Michael Davis Culpepper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stein v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority et al
as 3:2018cv00564
Defendant:
Frank Moon, Lila Wigan, Rodney Monroe and others
Plaintiff:
Carol Andrea Stein
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keck v. Mattamy Carolina Corporation et al
as 3:2015cv00616
Plaintiff:
Dana Keck
Defendant:
Mattamy Carolina Corporation , David Mueller and John/Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
TD Bank, N.A. v. Mueller
as 1:2013cv00298
Plaintiff:
TD Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Michael E. Mueller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00483
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00406
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00244
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00026
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Abodabba v. Holder et al
as 3:2012cv00816
Plaintiff:
Nael Abodabba
Defendant:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., Robert S. Mueller, III and Timothy J Healy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
ANGUS v. MUELLER, et al
as 1:2012cv00821
Plaintiff:
DANNY K. ANGUS
Defendant:
ROBERT S. MUELLER, ZINETA DEDOVIC, JACK LUTZ and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
