Cases
Painters and Allied Trades v. Forest Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al
as 16-8024
Plaintiff - Petitioner: PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES DISTRICT COUNCIL 82 HEATH CARE FUND
Plaintiff: MARTHA PALUMBO, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated (09-11532), PETER PALUMBO, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated (09-11532), JAYNE EHRLICH, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated (09-11532) and others
Defendant - Respondent: FOREST LABORATORIES, INC. and FOREST PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Defendant: WARNER-LAMBERT CO. and PFIZER, INC.
Interested Party: NATALIE LUSTER
Luster v. Forest Laboratories, Inc., et al
as 14-2070
Plaintiff - Appellee: MARTHA PALUMBO, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated, PETER PALUMBO, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated, JAYNE EHRLICH, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated and others
Interested Party - Appellant: NATALIE LUSTER
Plaintiff: TARA JOHNDROW, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, BRIAN ANSON, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, SCOTT A. WILCOX, on behalf of himself & all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee: FOREST LABORATORIES, INC., FOREST PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and WARNER-LAMBERT CO.
Defendant: PFIZER, INC.
Jaeckel, et al v. Forest Laboratories, Inc., et al
as 14-8004
Plaintiff: JAYNE EHRLICH, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated, ANNA MURRET, UNIVERSAL CARE, INC. and others
Plaintiff - Respondent: ANGELA JAECKEL, MARTHA PALUMBO, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated, PETER PALUMBO, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated and others
Defendant: PFIZER, INC. and WARNER-LAMBERT CO.
Defendant - Petitioner: FOREST LABORATORIES, INC. and FOREST PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Interested Party: NATALIE LUSTER
Wilcox v. Forest Laboratories, Inc., et al
as 13-8008
Plaintiff - Petitioner: SCOTT A. WILCOX
Plaintiff: MARTHA PALUMBO, PETER PALUMBO, JAYNE EHRLICH and others
Defendant - Respondent: FOREST LABORATORIES, INC. and FOREST PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Defendant: PFIZER, INC. and WARNER-LAMBERT CO.
Central Regional Employees Benefit Fund et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv04478
Plaintiff: Central Regional Employees Benefit Fund , North Jersey Municipal Employee Benefits Fund , Southern New Jersey Regional Employee Benefits Fund and others
Defendant: SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Municipal Reinsurance Health Insurance Fund et al v. Forest Laboratories Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv12070
Plaintiff: Municipal Reinsurance Health Insurance Fund, Central Regional Employee Benefit Fund, North Jersey Municipal Employee Benefit Fund and others
Defendant: Forest Laboratories Inc., Forest Laboratories, Inc. and Forest Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Multi District Litigation - 28 USC 1407
Type: Contract Plaintiff
Central Regional Employees Benefit Fund et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2009cv02125
Plaintiff: Central Regional Employees Benefit Fund, Central Regional Employees Benefit Fund, Central Regional Employees Benefit Fund and others
Defendant: SmithKline Beecham Corporation and GlaxoSmithKline plc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
CENTRAL REGIONAL EMPLOYEES BENEFIT FUND ("CREBF") et al v. CEPHALON, INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv03418
Plaintiff: CENTRAL REGIONAL EMPLOYEES BENEFIT FUND ("CREBF"), THE NORTH JERSEY MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEE BENEFITS FUND ("NJMEBF"), THE SOUTHERN NEW JERSEY REGIONALEMPLOYEE BENEFITS FUND ("SNJREBF") and others
Defendant: CEPHALON, INC., CIMA LABS, INC., JOHN DOES 1-100 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?