Cases 31 - 40 of 237
MURPHY v. STATE OF N.C.
as 1:2022cv00973
Petitioner:
JAMES L. MURPHY
Respondent:
STATE OF N.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
v. TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv00971
Plaintiff:
ADRIAN MURPHY
Defendant:
TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC., TITLEMAX OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC., TMX FINANCE OF VIRGINIA, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00459
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00344
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Taffe v. Scott
as 5:2022ct03224
Plaintiff:
Timothy Taffe
Defendant:
C/O Scott, Warden King, Warden Scarantino and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
LECOCQ v. MURPHY
as 1:2022cv00487
Plaintiff:
ANDREE LECOCQ
Defendant:
BRIAN MURPHY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Sneed v. Kreep et al
as 5:2022ct03197
Plaintiff:
Jvon P. Sneed
Defendant:
Detective M.J. Kreep, Magistrate Underwood, Magistrate M.D. Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brice v. Gaston County Sheriffs Office/Jail-Detention et al
as 3:2022cv00280
Plaintiff:
Romeal Brice
Defendant:
Gaston County Sheriffs Office/Jail-Detention, FNU Shirley, FNU Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURPHY v. STATE OF N.C.
as 1:2022cv00441
Petitioner:
James L. Murphy
Respondent:
STATE OF N.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Murphy v. State of N.C.
as 1:2022cv00111
Petitioner:
James L. Murphy
Respondent:
State of N.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
