Cases 41 - 50 of 177
Murphy v. Emcare, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00516
Defendant:
Envision Physician Services, LLC, Emcare, Inc., Emergency Medicine Associates, P.A. and others
Plaintiff:
Melodie Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Annarelli v. Clarke et al
as 7:2020cv00261
Defendant:
T. Heffinger, K. Crowder, Harold W. Clarke and others
Plaintiff:
David J. Annarelli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
v. Murphy et al
as 1:2020cv00337
Defendant:
Lyle Davidson, Loudoun County, Judy Lew and others
Plaintiff:
Rodney J. Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chand v. Kiser et al
as 7:2020cv00181
Defendant:
Ms. Murphy, C.O. Sexton, Walter Swiney and others
Plaintiff:
Vinnie Vincent Chand
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00071
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meyers v. Hamilton et al
as 2:2020cv00049
Defendant:
Eugene Murphy, Robert Krask and Warden I. Hamilton
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington-Lee High School Alumni Association, Inc. v. Arlington County School Board et al
as 1:2020cv00060
Defendant:
Cintia Z. Johnson, Barbara Kanninen, Reid Goldstein and others
Plaintiff:
Washington-Lee High School Alumni Association, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Purisima et al v. County of Arlington, Virginia et al
as 1:2020cv00065
Defendant:
Donald Payne, Jr., Jacky Rosen, Abby Finkenauer and others
Plaintiff:
Does 1-100, United States of America and Anton Purisima
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Murphy v. Common Wealth of Virginia et al
as 1:2020cv00028
Defendant:
Department of social services, Town Of Leesburg and Common wealth of Virginia
Plaintiff:
Rodney J. Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Burden
as 2:2020cv00020
Defendant:
Katrina Lynn Burden
Plaintiff:
Rodney J. Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
