Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 38
NATIONAL IMMIGRATION PROJECT et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF US ATTORNEYS et al
as 1:2024cv00641
Plaintiff: NATIONAL IMMIGRATION PROJECT and MUSLIM ADVOCATES
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF US ATTORNEYS and UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
ABDAL RAZAK ALI V. TRUMP, ET AL. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv01020
Petitioner: ABDUL RAZAK ALI
Respondent: MIKE BUMGARNER, GEORGE WALKER BUSH, JAY HOOD and others
Amicus Curiae: MUSLIM ADVOCATES, DUE PROCESS SCHOLARS and CENTER FOR VICTIMS OF TORTURE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Does, et al v. Mills, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-1826
Plaintiff / Appellant: JOHN DOES, 1-3, JACK DOES, 1-1000, JANE DOES, 1-6 and others
Defendant / Appellee: JANET T. MILLS, in her official capacity as Governor of the State of Maine, JEANNE LAMBREW, NIRAV D. SHAH, in his official capacity as Director of the Maine Center for Disease Control and Prevention and others
Petitioner: AMERICANS UNITED FOR SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE, AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF MAINE and others
Amicus Curiae: GLOBAL JUSTICE INSTITUTE and METROPOLITAN COMMUNITY CHURCHES
ANAM et al v. BUSH et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2004cv01194
Petitioner: BISHER NASER ALI ALMARWALH, MASAAB OMAR AL-MADHWANI, ABDULKHALIQ AL-BAIDHANI and others
Respondent: GEORGE WALKER BUSH, DONALD RUMSFELD, JAY HOOD and others
Amicus Curiae: CHARLES B. GITTINGS, JR., MUSLIM ADVOCATES, DUE PROCESS SCHOLARS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Anas Elhady v. Charles Kable, IV
as 20-1311
Plaintiff / Appellee: SAMIR ANWAR, WAEL HAKMEH, MURAT FRLJUCKIE and others
Defendant / Appellant: KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, Acting Commissioner of United States Customs and Border Protection in his official capacity, CHARLES H. KABLE, IV, Director of the Terrorist Screening Center, in his official capacity, NICHOLAS J. RASMUSSEN, Director of the National Counterterrorism Center in his official capacity and others
Amicus Curiae: THE RUTHERFORD INSTITUTE, CATO INSTITUTE, FRED T. KOREMATSU CENTER FOR LAW & EQUALITY and others
Not Yet Classified: ALAN MICHAEL MYGATT-TAUBER
ABDULLAH et al v. BUSH et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2005cv00023
Petitioner: HANI SALEH RASHID ABDULLAH, YOSRA SALEH RASHID ABDULLAH, RAMI BIN SAAD AL-OTEIBI and others
Respondent: GEORGE WALKER BUSH, DONALD RUMSFELD, JAY HOOD and others
Amicus Curiae: MUSLIM ADVOCATES, DUE PROCESS SCHOLARS and CENTER FOR VICTIMS OF TORTURE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Elim Romanian Pentecostal Chur, et al v. Jay Pritzker We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-1811
Defendant / Appellee: JAY R. PRITZKER, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Illinois
Plaintiff / Appellant: ELIM ROMANIAN PENTECOSTAL CHURCH and LOGOS BAPTIST MINISTRIES
Amicus Curiae: AMERICAN NURSES ASSOCIATION-ILLINOIS, CITY OF CHICAGO, ILLINOIS STATE MEDICAL SOCIETY and others
MUSLIM ADVOCATES et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE et al
as 1:2020cv01143
Defendant: DEPARTMENT OF STATE, CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE and others
Plaintiff: NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC. and MUSLIM ADVOCATES
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
International Refugee Assistance Project et al v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 3:2019cv06809
Plaintiff: ACLU of Northern California, International Refugee Assistance Project and Muslim Advocates
Defendant: U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Department of Justice, U.S. Department of State and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
MUSLIM ADVOCATES v. UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION
as 1:2019cv02396
Defendant: UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION
Plaintiff: MUSLIM ADVOCATES
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?