Cases 31 - 40 of 52
Weems v. Myers et al
as 1:2020cv00092
Defendant:
SGT MYERS, Officer Speed, Officer Samuels and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick Weems
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MANNING v. SPENCER et al
as 1:2020cv00072
Defendant:
COUNSELOR SPENCER and WARDEN MYER
Plaintiff:
PERVIS DESEAN MANNING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WUESCHER v. MYERS et al
as 1:2020cv00040
Respondent:
WARDEN MYERS and GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Petitioner:
AARON WUESCHER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SYNOVUS BANK v. MYERS et al
as 4:2020cv00044
Defendant:
WILLIAM P. MYERS and JUDY D MYERS
Plaintiff:
SYNOVUS BANK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARVEY v. LUMPKIN, CITY OF et al
as 4:2019cv00046
Defendant:
Gary Yochum, Jr., CHIEF JOHN TYLER, SHANENA HALE and others
Plaintiff:
ELIJAH HARVEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BOX v. JAGGER REALTY et al
as 5:2018cv00255
Defendant:
BLAIR MYERS, BETTER HOMES AND GARDENS REAL ESTATE SUCCESS and JAGGER REALTY
Plaintiff:
KELLIE BOX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HUMPHREY v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 1:2018cv00075
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA HUMPHREY
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP and MCKESSON CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LUCAS v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 5:2018cv00113
Plaintiff:
LINDA LUCAS
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP and MCKESSON CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCGHEE v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 5:2018cv00114
Plaintiff:
ROY MCGHEE
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP and MCKESSON CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HUNT v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 5:2017cv00419
Plaintiff:
JOHN WESLEY HUNT, SR
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP and MCKESSON CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
