Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Bibbs v. Macay et al
as 3:2023cv03023
Plaintiff:
Martin J. Bibbs
Defendant:
Lt. E. Macay, Correctional Officer A. Pola and E. Borla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson v. Thomas et al
as 5:2022cv02166
Plaintiff:
Johndell Henderson
Defendant:
Michael Thomas, Herman Clavijo, Pedro Soto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
King v. Macay et al
as 4:2021cv08309
Plaintiff:
Rashad Lamar King
Defendant:
E. Macay, C. Tange, M. Atchley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Huynh v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) et al
as 3:2021cv04039
Defendant:
P. Sullivan, B. Avina, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) and others
Plaintiff:
Tri Huu Huynh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Atchley et al
as 3:2021cv01584
Defendant:
P. Sullivan, Macay, Adriano and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher J Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Foss et al
as 3:2020cv03857
Defendant:
P. Stevenson, Sargeant Barroso, Christy Tange and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Ray Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKinnon v. Binkele et al
as 5:2018cv06035
Defendant:
C. Hernandez, A. Lugue, S. Wong and others
Plaintiff:
Willie S. McKinnon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Macay v. City and County of San Francisco et al
as 3:2010cv05883
Plaintiff:
Jorge Macay
Defendant:
City and County of San Francisco, San Francisco Sheriff's Department, Deputy Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv13120
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Fuentes v. Tilton et al
as 2:2007cv00941
Petitioner:
Robert Fuentes
Respondent:
James Tilton, Scott Kernan, James Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
