Cases 1 - 10 of 144
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv11902
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Bridges v. Macy's Retail Holdings Inc et al
as 3:2018cv01293
Plaintiff:
Susie Ann Bridges
Defendant:
Macy's Retail Holdings Inc , Gordon Brothers Retail Partners LLC , Gordon Brothers Asset Advisors LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Helms et al v. Macy's Retail Holding, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv00103
Plaintiff:
Michael Byrne Helms and J.T. Helms
Defendant:
Macy's Retail Holding, Inc. , John Doe and Employee of Macy's Retail Holding Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shoemaker v. Macy's, Inc.
as 4:2018cv00867
Plaintiff:
Joe Shoemaker
Defendant:
Macy's, Inc. and Macy's Retail Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mohamed v. Macy's Retail Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00728
Defendant:
Macy's Retail Holdings Inc. , Macy's Inc. and Palmer, Reifler & Associates, P.A.
Plaintiff:
Abeer Mohamed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv10290
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Macy's West Stores, Inc. et al v. One Blow Dry Bar, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00070
Plaintiff:
Macy's West Stores, Inc. and Macy's Retail Holdings, Inc.
Defendant:
One Blow Dry Bar, Inc. and Aurelio Ventrella, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Burns v. Macy's Retail Holdings, Inc., et al
as 3:2017cv01808
Plaintiff:
Audrey Vercher Burns
Defendant:
Jane Deaux and Macy's Retail Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Avalos v. Macy's Texas, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv03467
Plaintiff:
Alejandra Medina Avalos
Defendant:
Macy's Texas Inc , Macy's Inc and Macy's Retail Holdings Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DESIR v. MACY'S SPRINGFIELD et al
as 2:2017cv05682
Plaintiff:
ORAMISE DESIR
Defendant:
MACY'S SPRINGFIELD and MACY'S RETAIL HOLDINGS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
