Cases 11 - 20 of 86
CARROLL, JR. v. GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2022cv01720
Plaintiff:
ARTIS C. CARROLL, JR.
Defendant:
GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, DELAWARE COUNTY OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE GEO GROUP, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00601
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
PATEL v. VIATRIS, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv01769
Plaintiff:
RAJESH PATEL
Defendant:
VIATRIS, INC., PFIZER INC., MICHAEL GOETTLER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MELCHIOR et al v. VAGNOZZI et al
as 2:2020cv05562
Defendant:
PILLAR II LIFE SETTLEMENT FUND, L.P., JASON ZWIEBEL, SPARTAN INCOME FUND, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL D GROFF, DOMINICK BELLIZZIE, SHAWN P CARLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
IVERS v. BRENTWOOD BOROUGH SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
as 2:2020cv01244
Defendant:
BRENTWOOD BOROUGH SCHOOL DISTRICT, NOAH MADDEN, FLOYD OLSAVICKY and others
Plaintiff:
LUCAS M. IVERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MADDEN v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2020cv03733
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Plaintiff:
SYLVIA J MADDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MADDEN v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
as 2:2019cv02252
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC., WALMART INC., WALMART STORES INC. and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MADDEN and MADELL MADDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MADDEN v. CANUS CORPORATION
as 2:2019cv01632
Defendant:
CANUS CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
KATHERINE MADDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
MICHAELS v. MADDEN et al
as 2:2019cv00207
Defendant:
WESTMORELAND COUNTY JAIL, US MARSHALL PENNSYLVANIA, WESTMORELAND COUNTY COURTHOUSE and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES THOMAS MICHAELS and JAMES THOMAS MICHAELS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
