Cases 21 - 27 of 27
Sharp et al v. Lujan Grisham et al
as 1:2019cv00986
Defendant:
Hector Balderas, Maggie Toulouse-Oliver, Paul Cassidy and others
Plaintiff:
Tommy Sharp and Nick Johnson
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Frank Heindel v. Marci Andino
as 19-1204
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT MOSELY, Member of the South Carolina State Election Commission, in his official capacity, BILLY WAY, JR., Chair of the South Carolina State Election Commission, in his official capacity, MARCI ANDINO, Executive Director of the South Carolina State Election Commission, in her official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRANK HEINDEL and PHIL P. LEVENTIS
Amicus Curiae:
MAGGIE TOULOUSE OLIVER, Secretary of State for New Mexico, DUNCAN A. BUELL, Professor, Department of Computer Science and Engineering and NCR Chair of Computer Science and Engineering, University of South Carolina, JOSEPH R. KINIRY, Principal Scientist, Galois, and Principled CEO and Chief Scientist, Free & Fair and others
Emrit v. Toulouse Oliver et al
as 1:2017cv01024
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Maggie Toulouse Oliver and Democratic Party of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
A.L. v. Bernalillo County et al
as 1:2016cv00266
Plaintiff:
A. L.
Defendant:
Bernalillo County, Art de la Cruz, Maggie Hart-Stebbins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fleming et al v. Gutierrez et al
as 1:2013cv00222
Plaintiff:
Teresa Fleming , David Doyle , Paula Papponi and others
Defendant:
Eddie Gutierrez , Sally Padilla , Eileen Garbangi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Reyes v. Toulouse-Oliver
as 09-2043
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL KEITH REYES
Defendant - Appellee:
MAGGIE TOULOUSE-OLIVER
Reyes v. Toulouse Oliver
as 1:2009cv00070
Plaintiff:
Paul Keith Reyes
Defendant:
Maggie Toulouse Oliver
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
