Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Magill v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00383
Plaintiff:
Cody D. Magill
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01670
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Magill et al v. Northwell Health, Inc et al
as 1:2019cv07878
Plaintiff:
Goldah Magill and Edward Magill
Defendant:
Lenox Hill Hospital and Northwell Health, Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv07311
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Paez et al v. Whaleneck Enterprises et al
as 2:2016cv02673
Plaintiff:
Ramon A. Jimenez Peralta, Rafael Luna, Aquiles V Nunez and others
Defendant:
Lindsay Magill and Whaleneck Enterprises
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Laguna v. Kwan et al
as 1:2013cv07079
Plaintiff:
Nick Laguna
Defendant:
Kwan, Genovese and Magill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crique v. Magill et al
as 1:2012cv03345
Plaintiff:
Roger Jason Crique
Defendant:
Richard Magill, Kun-Young Chung and Mount Vernon Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Blanco et al v. ADF Pizza I LLC et al
as 1:2011cv00588
Plaintiff:
Angela Blanco and Nicholas Magill
Defendant:
ADF Pizza I LLC, Take Home The Bread LLC and XYZ Entities 1-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Ceparano v. Suffolk County, NY et al
as 2:2010cv02030
Defendant:
P.O. "John Doe's #'s 10-50", "Supervisor of Bradford S. Magill", "Supervisor of Patricia Brosco" and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony J. Ceparano
MADD:
Mother's Against Drunk Driving
Peeping Pervert:
Cathy Ryan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas v. O'Brien et al
as 5:2008cv00318
Plaintiff:
Gregory Thomas
Defendant:
James O'Brien and Gary Magil
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
