Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Chakrabarti et al v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 2:2021cv01316
Plaintiff:
Atreyi Chakrabarti, Mohan ABBURU, Majid ABDUL and others
Defendant:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and Ur Jaddou
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
JULESBURG (USA) INC. et al v. GREATER NEW YORK INSURANCE COMPANIES et al
as 2:2021cv02136
Interested Party:
KNIGHTS FRANCHISE SYSTEMS, INC., WYNDHAM WORLDWIDE CORPORATIONS, WYNDHAM HOTELS AND RESORTS, INC. and others
Defendant:
GREATER NEW YORK INSURANCE COMPANIES D/B/A STARTHMORE INSURANCE COMPANY, THE PAWSON GROUP and GREATER NEW YORK INSURANCE COMPANIES doing business as STRATHMORE INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff:
MAHESH PATEL and JULESBURG (USA) INC.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635
GREENIDGE v. LEHNOWSKY et al
as 2:2020cv06476
Defendant:
WELLPATH, LLC, MANFREY, STEPHEN WIENER and others
Plaintiff:
GABRIEL GREENIDGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01828
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BONAPARTE et al v. BENSALEM TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2017cv03209
Plaintiff:
RODNEY BONAPARTE and APRIL KILSON
Defendant:
BENSALEM TOWNSHIP , POLICE OFFICER JOHN DOE #1, POLICE OFFICER JOHN DOE #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GRAPHIC STYLES/STYLES INTERNATIONAL LLC v. FITWELL CUSTOM TAILORS, INCORPORATED et al
as 2:2014cv04598
Plaintiff:
GRAPHIC STYLES/STYLES INTERNATIONAL LLC
Defendant:
FITWELL CUSTOM TAILORS, INCORPORATED and MAHESH HARPALANI
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv01510
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00070
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (IMMIGRATION)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
