Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Mahone et al v. Becker et al
as 3:2023cv00122
Plaintiff:
Kevin Mahone, Kevin Phillip Mahone, Sr, Hope Marie Allman and others
Defendant:
Vickie Becker, Anna Rich, Kris Seymore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01134
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
MAHONE v. HOLCOMB et al
as 2:2020cv00539
Plaintiff:
MARCUS MAHONE
Defendant:
HENRY, PHEGLEY, HARTZELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GLOVER v. INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPT. et al
as 1:2019cv00653
Defendant:
RICH MAHON, KEVIN LAVERMAN and INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPT.
Plaintiff:
JERRY W. GLOVER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mahone v. Superintendent
as 3:2017cv00328
Petitioner:
Donald E Mahone
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones et al v. Hammond City of et al
as 2:2014cv00362
Plaintiff:
Jamal Jones , Lisa Mahone and JI
Defendant:
Hammond City of , Patrick Vicari , Charles Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARRICK v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2014cv01137
Defendant:
KIRK BARRICK, TERESA BARRICK, CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BARRICK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mahone v. Herfel et al
as 2:2013cv00378
Plaintiff:
Christopher Mahone
Defendant:
Billy J Herfel , BH Freight LLC and BH Freight Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gary City of et al v. Bonaventura et al
as 2:2013cv00057
Plaintiff:
Gary City of , East Chicago City of , Carlton Mahone and others
Defendant:
The Honorable Mary Beth Bonaventura and The Honorable John Pera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
SRIVASTAVA v. BAYH et al
as 1:2012cv01295
Defendant:
AFNI, INC., MARK BANNATYNE, JOHN BARTHOLOMEW and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN HERZ SRIVASTAVA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
