Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Williams v. Nept et al
as 4:2026cv04094
Plaintiff:
Damion Lee Williams
Defendant:
Kannesha Nept, Kellie Wasko, Tabatha Benting and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Sanchez v. Rodriguez
as 4:2023cv03230
Plaintiff:
Francisco Sanchez
Defendant:
Major Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Silvas v. Stg Dept et al
as 4:2022cv03871
Plaintiff:
Julian G Silvas
Defendant:
Stg Dept, Sgrt Shelly, Major Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Silvas v. Captain Simmons et al
as 4:2022cv03437
Plaintiff:
Julian Silvas
Defendant:
Captain Simmons, Warden Wonders, Sergeant Gmotoamosi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez v. Warden Wynne Unit et al
as 4:2021cv03177
Plaintiff:
Francisco Sanchez
Defendant:
Warden Wynne Unit and Major Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Jose Colon et al
as 1:2020cv23668
Defendant:
Martinez J. Love, Major Rodriguez, Warden, Dade County C.I. and others
Plaintiff:
Dionte Jermaine Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steven Ferguson v. M. Bragg, et al
as 13-50892
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN M. FERGUSON
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN M. TRAVIS BRAGG, LEO LAWRENCE ALTENBERG, Medical Doctor, Clinical Director, RODRIGO CHAVEZ, Health Services Administrator and others
Steven Ferguson v. M. Bragg, et al
as 13-50439
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN M. FERGUSON
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN M. TRAVIS BRAGG, LEO LAWRENCE ALTENBERG, Medical Doctor, Clinical Director, RODRIGO CHAVEZ, Health Services Administrator and others
Ferguson v. Bragg et al
as 3:2011cv00560
Defendant:
Leo Lawrence Altenberg, M.D., Guard Ballesteros, Warden M. Travis Bragg and others
Plaintiff:
Steven M. Ferguson
Notice Only Party:
Magdalena Jara
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
