Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv08619
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01533
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Innovative Sports Management Incorporated v. Ghuman et al
as 2:2022cv02018
Plaintiff:
Innovative Sports Management Incorporated doing business as Integrated Sports Media
Defendant:
Sukhi Singh Ghuman individually doing business as Union Jack, Kevin Currie Johnston individually doing business as Union Jack, Manjinder Singh individually doing business as Union Jack and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Communications Act of 1934
Beesla v. Vela
as 2:2021cv01298
Plaintiff:
Manjinder Singh Beesla
Defendant:
Israel Vela
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Beesla v. Seigel
as 3:2021cv05699
Plaintiff:
Manjinder Singh Beesla
Defendant:
Tom Seigel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beesla v. Pierce County Sheriff's Department
as 3:2021cv05619
Plaintiff:
Manjinder Singh Beesla
Defendant:
Pierce County Sheriffs Department and Pierce County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beesla v. Port of Seattle Police
as 2:2021cv01155
Plaintiff:
Manjinder Singh Beesla
Defendant:
Port of Seattle Police
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Beesla v. Sabha
as 2:2021cv01154
Plaintiff:
Manjinder Singh Beesla
Defendant:
Gurudwara Singh Sabha
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Beesla v. State of Washington et al
as 3:2021cv05611
Plaintiff:
Manjinder Singh Beesla
Defendant:
State of Washington and Jay Inslee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beesla v. State of Washington et al
as 3:2020cv05721
Plaintiff:
Manjinder Singh Beesla
Defendant:
Jay Inslee and State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
