Cases 1 - 10 of 63
Christopher B. Cosimano v. Dr. Micheal Mank et al
as 5:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
Christopher B. Cosimano
Defendant:
Dr. Micheal Mank and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mank v. Exactech Inc et al
as 1:2023cv01961
Plaintiff:
Richard Mank
Defendant:
Exactech Inc, Exactech U.S., Inc., TPG Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MANK v. EXACTECH INC et al
as 1:2023cv00097
Plaintiff:
RICHARD MANK
Defendant:
EXACTECH INC, EXACTECH US INC, TPG INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01409
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Daniel Pineda Zelaya v. Dr. Michael Mank et al
as 5:2022cv01917
Plaintiff:
Daniel Pineda Zelaya
Defendant:
Dr. Michael Mank, John Doe, Lt. John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alberto Hernandez v. United States of America et al
as 5:2022cv01977
Plaintiff:
Alberto Hernandez
Defendant:
United States of America, Michael Mank, Felipe Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christopher B. Cosimano v. S.I.S. Technicion Valli et al
as 5:2022cv00039
Plaintiff:
Christopher B. Cosimano
Defendant:
S.I.S. Technician Valli, Dr. Micheal Mank and EMT P. Gomez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franklin v. Moskonas et al
as 2:2021cv00601
Defendant:
Wisconsin Department of Corrections, City of Milwaukee Police Department, Artavius Bradford and others
Plaintiff:
Jesse J Franklin, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MANK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv02942
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GEORGE MANK
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
