Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Bustillos Ramirez v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00079
Plaintiff:
Jose Manuel Bustillos Ramirez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Ramirez-Ramirez v. USA
as 3:2023cv01126
Petitioner:
Jose Manuel Ramirez-Ramirez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Ramirez v. Warden FCI Yazoo City (Medium)
as 3:2022cv00162
Petitioner:
Manuel Lopez Ramirez
Respondent:
Stacey N. Stone and Warden FCI Yazoo City (Medium)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Steven Wayne Bonilla v. Kevin J. Lane et al
as 2:2018cv06576
Defendant:
Kevin J. Lane, John Doe and Manuel A. Ramirez
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonilla v. Rodriquez et al
as 3:2018cv01759
Defendant:
Judge Manuel A Ramirez, Kevin Lanc, John Doe 1-15 and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Ramirez v. Livingston et al
as 3:2015cv00321
Plaintiff:
Manuel Caudillo Ramirez
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Steve Massie, Jacqueline Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glaria-Ramirez v. Babcock
as 2:2014cv00648
Petitioner:
Juan Manuel Glaria-Ramirez
Respondent:
Michael Babcock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
United States v. Glaria-Ramirez
as 13-8078
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JUAN MANUEL GLARIA-RAMIREZ
ELIAS-RAMIREZ v. USA
as 2:2013cv00026
Petitioner:
Jose Manuel Elias-Ramirez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Gomez-Ramirez v. King County Superior Court
as 2:2013cv00594
Petitioner:
Victor Manuel Gomez-Ramirez
Respondent:
King County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
