Cases 1 - 10 of 61
Erica Manuel-Soto, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1089
Petitioner:
ERICA NOHEMI MANUEL-SOTO, ELFEGO ISMAEL ESTRADA-SIMON, D. E. E.-M. and others
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
SOTO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv30976
Plaintiff:
MANUEL SOTO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hector Soto, Jr.In re: Hector Soto, Jr.
as 23-1739
Petitioner:
In re: HECTOR MANUEL SOTO, JR.
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY BERKS COUNTY
Tinoco et al v. Quest Drilling Company, LLC.
as 2:2023cv00066
Plaintiff:
Armando Tinoco, Victor Manuel Soto and Gustavo Alberto Montalvo Bernal
Defendant:
Quest Drilling Company, LLC.
SOTO
as 2:2023cv01392
Plaintiff:
HECTOR MANUEL SOTO, JR.
Respondent:
Superintenden Tina Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SOTO v. WALKER et al
as 5:2023cv01392
Petitioner:
HECTOR MANUEL SOTO, JR.
Respondent:
TINA WALKER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Soto v. Edelen
as 5:2022cv00058
Plaintiff:
Matteo Manuel Soto
Defendant:
Christopher Edelen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SOTO v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv00496
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MANUEL SOTO, JR. and MANUEL SOTO, JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Soto, Jr. v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2021cv00556
Defendant:
Aearo Holding LLC, Aearo Intermediate LLC, Aearo Technologies LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Manuel Soto, Jr.
SOTO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv38596
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MANUEL SOTO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
