Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Envolve Client Services Group, LLC v. Maple Place LP et al
as 2:2022cv02696
Plaintiff:
Envolve Client Services Group, LLC
Defendant:
Maple Place LP, NLR RAD Family Homes LP, Hickory View RAD LP and others
Not Classified By Court:
Jamita Swearengen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Anderson v. Long et al
as 3:2022cv00287
Plaintiff:
Noble Boyd Eugene Anderson
Defendant:
Patrica Hall Long, David Maples, Justin Treadwell and others
Maples v. Rogers
as 3:2021cv00179
Respondent:
Sam Rogers
Petitioner:
Charles Travis Maples
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Knox Trailers, Inc et al v. Clark et al
as 3:2020cv00137
Plaintiff:
Knox Trailers, Inc. and Post Trailer Repairs, Inc.
Defendant:
Roy Bailey, Paul Hennager, Titan Trailers Repairs & Sales, LLC. and others
Seiber v. Anderson County Tenn. et al
as 3:2019cv00424
Defendant:
Anderson County Tenn., Anderson County Sheriff Dept., Southern Health Partners and others
Plaintiff:
Joey Douglas Seiber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jordan v. Williams et al
as 1:2019cv01146
Defendant:
Deon Williams and Maple Rice
Plaintiff:
Jackqueline M Jordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maples v. Life Insurance Company of North America (PLR2)
as 1:2018cv00216
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Plaintiff:
David Maples
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Wilken v. Jefferson County et al (PLR1)
as 3:2017cv00505
Plaintiff:
William Wilken
Defendant:
Jefferson County, Tennessee, C Edmonds, K Maples and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Maples v. United States of America
as 3:2017cv00912
Plaintiff:
Jacob Anthony Maples
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Boling et al v. CSX Transportation, Inc. et al (TV1)
as 3:2016cv00488
Defendant:
CSX Transportation, Inc. , Union Tank Car Company , Michael Puckett and others
Plaintiff:
Alan Bowdish , Martha Bruce , Kortnie Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
