Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Engel v. Maplewood Police Department, et al
as 4:2020cv01732
Plaintiff:
Joseph Michael Devon Engel
Defendant:
Maplewood Mayor, Maplewood City Council, Maplewood Deputy Chief and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Van Hofwegen v. Steiner et al
as 0:2017cv00795
Plaintiff:
Matthew Van Hofwegen
Defendant:
Joseph Steiner , Ramsey County and Maplewood, City of, the
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Defedo v. Schnell et al
as 0:2015cv02585
Plaintiff:
Nuro Bedasso Defedo
Defendant:
Maplewood, City of , Paul P. Schnell , City of Maplewood Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rollins, Summer v. Albert Lea, City of et al
as 0:2014cv00299
Plaintiff:
Summer Michelle Rollins
Defendant:
Albert Lea, City of , Anoka County , Anoka, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Porter v. Brooklyn Park, City of et al
as 0:2014cv00253
Defendant:
Brooklyn Park, City of , Caledonia, City of , Goodview, City of and others
Plaintiff:
Cynthya Lou Porter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kendall v. Albert Lea, City of et al
as 0:2014cv00247
Plaintiff:
Alix Kendall
Defendant:
Albert Lea, City of , Annandale, City of , Anoka County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Maplewood, City of et al
as 0:2013cv02856
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lee Washington
Defendant:
Maplewood, City of and Paul Bartz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGurty v. Hiebert et al
as 0:2012cv00892
Plaintiff:
Brian McGurty
Defendant:
Steven Hiebert, John Doe, Mr. Langer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gearin v. Rabbett et al
as 0:2010cv02227
Plaintiff:
Terry Gearin
Defendant:
Kevin Rabbett, Steve Heinz, Richard Doblar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phelps-Roper v. Maplewood, City of
as 4:2009cv01061
Plaintiff:
Shirley L. Phelps-Roper
Defendant:
Maplewood, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
