Cases 1 - 10 of 19
CitiMortgage Inc v. Bergsma et al
as 2:2023cv01699
Plaintiff:
CitiMortgage, Inc. and CitiMortgage Inc
Defendant:
Timothy L Bergsma, Kristin L Bergsma, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2023cv01698
Plaintiff:
Citimortgage Inc.
Defendant:
United States of America, Timothy L Bergsma, Kristin L Bergsma and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
United States of America v. Bergsma et al
as 2:2023cv01483
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Timothy Lee Bergsma, Kristin L Lynn, Craig Nelsen and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2023cv01478
Defendant:
Timothy Lee Bergsma, Kristin L Lynn, Craig Nelsen and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
Procopoi et al v. Clark County Police et al
as 3:2022cv05920
Plaintiff:
Marcel Procopoi and Daniela Lenuta Procopoi
Defendant:
Clark County Police and Clark County Child Protective Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Bradley-Zayas v. Robinson et al
as 3:2022cv05307
Plaintiff:
Marcel Bradley-Zayas
Defendant:
Denise Robinson, Karen Richholt, Katherine Diesch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pope v. Haynes
as 2:2021cv00265
Respondent:
Ron Haynes
Petitioner:
Eton Marcel Pope
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stolz v. Monsanto Company
as 2:2019cv00346
Plaintiff:
Marcel Stolz
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stolz v. Monsanto Company
as 4:2019cv05246
Plaintiff:
Marcel Stolz
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Alliance One Receivables Management, Inc.
as 2:2017cv00890
Defendant:
Alliance One Receivables Management, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Marcelle Jones
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
