Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Ezell v. Dinges
as 24-20050
Plaintiff:
Jody Ezell, Derivately on Behalf of Nominal Defendant Cabot Oil & Gas Corporation, Treppel Family Trust U/A Lawrence A. Treppel For the Benefit of Geri D. Treppel and Larry A. Treppel, John Hudson and others
Defendant:
Dan O. Dinges, Scott C. Schroeder, Dorothy M. Ables and others
OLIVERIO v. CABOT OIL & GAS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2022cv01679
Plaintiff:
JOHN S. OLIVERIO
Defendant:
CABOT OIL & GAS CORPORATION, DOROTHY M. ABLES, ROBERT S. BOSWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Miers v. Cabot Oil & Gas Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv07699
Plaintiff:
George Miers
Defendant:
Cabot Oil & Gas Corporation, Dan O. Dinges, Dorothy M. Ables and others
Bushansky v. Cabot Oil & Gas Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv07577
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bushansky
Defendant:
Cabot Oil & Gas Corporation, Dan O. Dinges, Dorothy M. Ables and others
Treppel Family Trust U/A 08/18/18 et al v. Dinges et al
as 4:2021cv03053
Plaintiff:
Treppel Family Trust U/A, Lawrence A. Treppel and Geri D. Treppel
Defendant:
Dan O. Dinges, Scott C Schroeder, Rhys J. Best and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ezell v. Dinges et al
as 4:2021cv02046
Defendant:
Rhys J. Best, Peter B. Delaney, Amanda M. Brock and others
Interested Party:
Cabot Oil & Gas Corporation
Plaintiff:
Jody Ezell, Leon Fischer and Robert Isaacs
Petitioner:
John Hudson
Isaacs v. Kelley et al
as 1:2021cv00118
Defendant:
Rhys J. Best, Scott C. Schroeder, W. Matt Ralls and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Isaacs
Ezell v. Dinges et al
as 3:2020cv01948
Defendant:
Rhys J. Best, Peter B. Delaney, Amanda M. Brock and others
Not Classified By Court:
Cabot Oil & Gas Corporation
Plaintiff:
Jody Ezell
Fischer v. Dinges et al
as 3:2020cv02119
Defendant:
Rhys J. Best, Cabot Oil & Gas Corporation, Peter B. Delaney and others
Plaintiff:
Leon Fischer
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
