Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Williams v. Paragon Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv06015
Plaintiff:
Marcus Williams
Defendant:
Paragon Systems, Inc., Grady Baker and Ranya Baker
Respondent:
Williams & Nickl, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2518
Williams v. RCN Telecom Services, LLC.
as 1:2018cv07038
Defendant:
RCN Telecom Services, LLC
Plaintiff:
Marcus Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Clifton v. United States of America
as 4:2017cv04146
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Marcus William Clifton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Williams v. Garnett et al
as 3:2017cv00501
Plaintiff:
Marcus Williams
Defendant:
Jason Garnett, Sullivan, Harrington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marcus Williams v. P.O. Carter, #16352 et al
as 1:2015cv03511
Plaintiff:
Marcus Williams
Defendant:
P.O. Bishop, P.O. Carter, Officers John Doe and others
Movant:
Gregory E. Kulis & Associates, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Williams v. Dart et al
as 1:2014cv04073
Plaintiff:
Marcus Williams
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Officer Tillrock, L. T. Zeyadeh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Holton et al
as 3:2013cv00977
Plaintiff:
Marcus Williams
Defendant:
Holton, Michael Schnicker and V Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen et al v. Rednour et al
as 3:2013cv00851
Plaintiff:
Anthony Allen, Darren Henderson, Derrick Parks and others
Defendant:
David A Rednour, Richard Harrington, Shannis Stock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams et al v. Dart et al
as 1:2007cv05490
Plaintiff:
Marcus Williams
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Salavador Godinez, Romaro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Romano et al
as 1:2007cv02851
Plaintiff:
Marcus Williams
Defendant:
Romano, Salavador Godinez, Thomas Dart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
