Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00343
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00246
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Lunnon v. Rigolo Productions LLC et al
as 1:2022cv07560
Plaintiff:
Brian Lunnon and Margarita Serrano
Defendant:
Rigolo Productions LLC and Rick Rosa
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv02366
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv
John David Martin v. San Diego Superior Court et al
as 2:2020cv10572
Defendant:
Marlon Mitchell, San Diego County District Attorney, San Diego Superior Court and others
Plaintiff:
John David Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Sean Hartranft v. Midland Funding, LLC, et al
as 19-56390
Defendant / Appellee:
MRC RECEIVABLES, ATLANTIC CREDIT AND FINANCE, INC., GLOBAL INTERNATIONAL and others
Not Classified By Court:
In re: MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC., TELEPHONE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT LITIGATION
Petitioner / Appellant:
SEAN HARTRANFT
Plaintiff:
LAVANCHY JOHNSON, RICHARD RAMCHARITAR, RUTH MOYA and others
Margarita Serrano v. Automotive Recovery Services, Inc.
as 3:2017cv00203
Plaintiff:
Margarita Serrano
Defendant:
Automotive Recovery Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01979
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Margarita Serrano v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.
as CAN/4:16-cv-04053
Plaintiff:
Margarita Serrano
Defendant:
Midland Credit Management, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv04053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
