Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Snell v. Descoteaux et al
as 1:2020cv12093
Defendant:
Michael Rodrigues, NP Michele LaFountain, MD Maria L. Angeles and others
Plaintiff:
Emory G. Snell, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reaves v. Department of Correction, et al
as 20-1433
Defendant:
CAROL HIGGINS O'BRIEN, Commissioner, MARIA L. ANGELES, Medical Director, MCI Shirley Medium, KHALID N. KHAN, MD, MD and others
Defendant / Appellant:
STEPHANIE Y. COLLINS, Asst. Deputy Comm. Clinical Services and Director of Health Services Division and DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
TIMOTHY M. REAVES
Interested Party:
DAVID J. KNEELAND, JR.
Reaves v. Department of Correction, et al
as 19-2089
Defendant:
JOHN MORIN, Deputy Superintendent, MCI Shirley Medium, CAROL HIGGINS O'BRIEN, Commissioner, DIANA GARCIA, RN, Director of Nursing, Souza Baranowski Correctional Center and others
Defendant / Appellant:
STEPHANIE Y. COLLINS, Asst. Deputy Comm. Clinical Services and Director of Health Services Division and DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
TIMOTHY M. REAVES
Interested Party:
DAVID J. KNEELAND, JR.
Hill v. Angeles, et al
as 16-1919
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK V. HILL
Defendant - Appellee:
MARIA L. ANGELES, LINDA BOOTH, THOMAS A. GROBLEWSKI, Program Medical Director and others
Defendant:
UMASS CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE
Hill v. Angeles, et al
as 16-1664
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK V. HILL
Defendant - Appellee:
DR. MARIA L. ANGELES, LINDA BOOTH and THOMAS A. GROBLEWSKI
Defendant:
UMASS CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE, DYANA NICKL, Grievance & Appeals Coordinator, PETER J. HEFFERNAN, Deputy Director Health Services Division and others
Hill v. UMass Correctional Health Care et al
as 4:2013cv40048
Plaintiff:
Mark V. Hill
Defendant:
UMass Correctional Health Care, Maria L. Angeles, Linda Booth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
