Cases 1 - 10 of 16
MURRAY et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv19860
Plaintiff:
RUTH MURRAY and THE ESTATE OF MARY MURRAY
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., KENVUE, INC. and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MURRAY v. GlaxoSmithKline Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv10899
Plaintiff:
MARIE MURRAY
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline Inc., GlaxoSmithKline LLC, Patheon Manufacturing Services LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Petersen v. The Fresh Market, Inc. et al
as 8:2019cv02360
Defendant:
Unknown Store Manager, The Fresh Market, Inc. and Mary Murray
Plaintiff:
Karen Petersen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harders et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2017cv00726
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER PRODUCTS, INC. and IMERYS TALC AMERICA INC
Plaintiff:
Christine Harders , Tammy Abell , Karen Arnholt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Murray et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00555
Plaintiff:
Marie Murray and Thomas Murray
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc., Tissue Science Laboratories Limited, Ethicon, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In Re: Ephedra Products Liability Litigation
as 1:2004md01598
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Carter, Maria Palacios, James Wende and others
Claimant:
Mellissa Barr, Official Committee of Ephedra Claimants of TL Administration Corporation and TL Administration Inc., Ozan Cirak and others
Defendant:
United States, Vera Kunisch, Nutrition & Fitness, Inc. and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Bio-Mark International, Inc., Garden State Nutritionals, a division of Vitaquest International, Inc., Sportika Export, Inc. and others
Counter Claimant:
GMP Laboratories of America, Inc.
Consolidated Defendant:
Wyeth Consumer Healthcare, Ltd.
Cross Claimant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, Vitalabs, Inc., The Chemins Company Inc. and others
Petitioner:
Jennifer Shaffer Maxwell and Sitrick and Company
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
John C Thornton, Esquire Arnold Levin, Basic Research LLC and others
Receiver:
Michael T. Yost
Special Master:
James Niss
Interested Party:
Ad Hoc Committee of Tort Claimants, Buchanan Ingersoll PC for Itself, as Former Attorneys for The Official Ephedra Claimants Committee and The Ad Hoc Committee of Ephedra Claimants, Starr Excess Insurance Company and others
Cross Defendant:
Twin Laboratories, Incorporated, Twin Lab Corporation, AST Sports Science, Inc. and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Twinlab Direct, Inc. (d/b/a Changes International, Inc.), Chattem, Inc., The Burgess Group Simply Weight Loss and others
Not Classified By Court:
north shore univesity hospital, EFRAN HUSSAIN, M.D., NILYA BHAWSAR, D.O. and others
Counter Defendant:
Blue California and Motherland International, Inc.
Trustee:
Trustee David M. Higgins and David M. Higgins Of The Settlement Law Group
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Ken Lilly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pl
MURRAY v. DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv04620
Plaintiff:
MARIE MURRAY
Defendant:
DAIICHI SANKYO, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO U.S. HOLDINGS, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Murray v. FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv11047
Plaintiff:
Mary Murray
Defendant:
FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC., Fresenius USA Inc., Fresenius USA Manufacturing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Murray v. Chrysler Group LLC et al
as 4:2014cv00715
Plaintiff:
Mary Murray
Defendant:
Chrysler Group LLC and Chrysler Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Murray v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv33813
Plaintiff:
Christina Marie Murray
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
