Cases 1 - 10 of 35
FINCHER v. HOLCOMB et al
as 2:2024cv00129
Plaintiff:
TRAVON FINCHER
Defendant:
ERIC J. HOLCOMB, CHRISTINA REAGLE, JACK HENDRIX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GARRETT v. HOLCOMB et al
as 2:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
MARKESE GARRETT
Defendant:
ERIC J. HOLCOMB, CHRISTINA REAGLE, JACK HENDRIX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ORR v. CENTURION HEALTH et al
as 1:2023cv02034
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ORR
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH, CHRISTINA REAGLE, ROBERT CARTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VELA v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2023cv00496
Plaintiff:
RENE VELA
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, KEVIN GILMORE, WVCF PLANT MANAGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ORR v. HOLCOMB et al
as 1:2023cv01831
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ORR
Defendant:
ERIC HOLCOMB, CHRISTINA REAGLE, ROBERT CARTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryan Sparks v. Thomas Teodosio, et al
as 23-3545
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRYAN SCOTT SPARKS
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS A. TEODOSIO, SHERRI BEVAN WALSH, SUSAN BAKER ROSS and others
MARTIN v. BONNER et al
as 2:2023cv00267
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
BONNER, RUTH MARY SIMS, SARAH CLARKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DUNIGAN v. RAJOLI et al
as 2:2021cv00311
Plaintiff:
LEE EVANS DUNIGAN
Defendant:
NAVEEN RAJOLI, KIM HOBSON, AMY WRIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIMS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC et al
as 3:2021cv01583
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
MARY SIMS
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TAFT v. LUCKETT et al
as 2:2021cv00002
Defendant:
MARY SIMS and BRADLEY N. LUCKETT
Plaintiff:
THOMAS TAFT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
